Anyone else see these new anti-marijuana ads on TV?
I’ve seen three of them. Here’s a short rundown:
• spot 1 – Two kids are in the study smoking weed and laughing and carrying on. Typical weed scene, right? One of them pulls a handgun out of his dad’s desk drawer. Waves it around and shoots his friend in the face. The message here is that responsible parents don’t leave loaded handguns in their desk. Especially when there is a bullet in the chamber. Right?
No. The message is that smoking weed makes you so idiotic and careless that you will probably shoot your friend in the face.
• spot 2 — Four guys are in the drive-thru of a fast-food joint. A little girl is riding her bike on the sidewalk perpendicular to the drive-thru window. The guys in the car are clearly high on weed, because they keep messing up their order. They realize they don’t have any money and ditch the drive-thru idea. Of course, on their way out of the parking lot, they mow down the girl on the bike. The message here is that children should not be riding bikes on the sidewalk AND definitely not riding bikes on the sidewalk against traffic. Right?
No. The message here is that when you get stoned and drive a car, you might run over a little girl on a bike because weed renders you completely blind and stupid. And if you don’t hit her with your car, you might just shoot her in the face accidentally.
• spot 3 — (Perhaps the strangest; definitely the most contradictory) A girl is at a party, stoned out of her mind. Some guys start molesting her. The message here is that you should never, under any circumstances, sexually assault anyone. Right?
No. The message is actually that girls who smoke weed at parties are inviting rape. If you smoke weed, you’re on your own, ladies. It will make you defenseless and you could be raped. You’ve been warned by a TV commercial, so if it happens it’s your own damn fault.
The contradictory thing about this last ad is that the caption tells you that “smoking marijuana impairs your judgement.” Yet the girl can be clearly heard to say “no” as the boys molest her (implied, off camera). Now, if marijuana impairs her judgement and she says “no,” does this mean that she would accept the boys’ advances if her judgement was sound and she was not smoking marijuana?
Weird.